Researchers make graphene more imperfect to increase its range of applications, and there's more to know about when diesel mixes with water than you might think.
View in browser
AAPG-logo-color-Horz
Enspired-Logo

Tuesday, 23 September, 2025 / Edition 77

I’m old enough to remember people intentionally cutting holes in their jeans for stylistic reasons. I usually wore hand-me-downs (with glee: In my mind, my older sisters were cool and wearing their clothes was awesome) and was quite hard on my clothes as a kid, so my jeans came by those holes honestly. It can be ironic to think that altering something in a way that appears to others as “damage” can improve it, but some scientists are exploring just that with graphene. Let’s dig in!

Sarah-Compton-Headshot-Signature (1)

 

Sarah Compton

 

Editor, Enspired

Perfection in Graphene is Not King

Graphene_GraphicWithArt

GraphicWithArt/Shutterstock.com

It’s the structure, silly: Diamonds and graphene are both made up of carbon atoms, but any geoscientist worth their salt knows that their atomic structure is what separates gems from batteries, solar panels, etc.

 

While diamonds’ carbon atoms are arranged in a tetrahedral structure with four covalent bonds, graphene’s carbon atoms are arranged in a single layer with a hexagonal lattice resembling a honeycomb and three covalent bonds.

 

Good and bad: Sudden craving for Honeycomb cereal aside, the structure of graphene plays a huge role in its industrial uses, but also in its shortcomings.

 

Thin, but strong: The honeycomb structure of graphene gives it very high tensile strength, and it’s also known as the thinnest 2D material in the world (sparking a whole new field of research).

 

Its 2D properties give rise to other cool things like transparency and high conductivity, but the story isn’t all sunshine and roses.

 

David Duncan, associate professor at the University of Nottingham, explains, “While perfect graphene is remarkable, it is sometimes too perfect. It interacts weakly with other materials and lacks crucial electronic properties required in the semiconductor industry.”

 

How do you improve something that’s already nearly perfect? You make it imperfect, of course.

 

What they did: Scientists from the University of Nottingham’s School of Chemistry, University of Warwick, and research center Diamond Light Source, including Dr. Duncan, added structural defects to graphene that improve the performance of the material.

 

Mimicry is the highest flattery: The team developed a single-step process to grow graphene-like films using a molecule, azupyrene, whose shape mimics that of the desired defect.

 

How it works: The honeycomb lattice of graphene requires six carbon atoms to make a whole honeycomb, and adding azupyrene creates a defect where neighboring rings have five or seven carbon atoms.

 

Dr. Duncan said, “We found the defects can make graphene more ‘sticky’ to other materials, making it more useful as a catalyst, as well as improving its capability of detecting different gases for use in sensors. The defects can also alter the electronic and magnetic properties of the graphene, for potential applications in the semiconductor industry.”

 

Driven by temperature: Azupyrene’s shape causes the irregular layout of carbon atoms, and when it’s used to grow graphene, the rate of growth of the defect can be controlled by modulating the temperature conditions.

 

One small step for man: Researchers at the National Graphene Institute in Manchester demonstrated that the defects remain in the graphene upon transfer to different surfaces, which is a big step toward applying the films to other devices.

 

Innovations and advancements galore: Aside from the innovative thought process of considering a defect an improvement, the work used advanced microscopy and spectroscopy at the Diamond Light Source in Oxfordshire, the MAX IV Laboratory in Sweden, and the UK’s national supercomputer ARCHER2 to study the defect’s presence and impacts on the defective graphene’s chemical and electronic properties.

 

Learn more: To learn the specifics behind the work, go here, and to read the full journal article, go here.

Sponsored

SpotfireAtIMAGE_YouTubeThumbnail

Spotfire at IMAGE

 

Sean Kimiagar stopped by to visit with Spotfire at IMAGE to hear about the Spotfire visual data science platform and how it empowers engineers with cutting-edge, energy-specific capabilities to gain operational and strategic insights from complex data.

WATCH VIDEO

When Oil Meets Water…There’s More to the Story Than You Think

DropletsOnGlass_Stopabox

Stopabox/Shutterstock.com

Improving our understanding of the water-oil displacement behavior in a natural aquifer could go a long way in helping remove unwanted organic contaminants. First, some background.

 

Location, location, location: While the presence of oil in a multiphase fluid is usually a good thing in an oil and gas reservoir, it’s not so great in a water aquifer.

 

Opposites don’t attract: Fortunately for our aquifers, water and oil don’t mix well, but separating them is more nuanced than we might think.

 

The enemy of my enemy: Hydrophobic materials don’t like water, but they do a good job of attracting oil, and they’ve been used previously to absorb oil.

 

Driving the news: Investigating this process at the pore level hasn’t been done previously, or at least isn’t extensively understood.

 

Dr. Seunghak Lee, Jaeshik Chung, and Sang Hyun Kim of the Water Resources Cycle Research Center at the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) investigated the performance of hydrophobic adsorbents used in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) at the pore level.

 

What they did: Their goal was to investigate oil (diesel) retention and subsequent changes in relative permeability in porous media with different wettabilities.

 

What they found: The team found that under constant differential pressure conditions oil easily escapes from hydrophobic surfaces while hydrophillic materials found their love for oil also and retained more.

 

Geometry and physics: The reason has to do with contact angles and pressure differentials created by those angles:

  • In a water-wet (hydrophillic) surface, water spreads out across the surface and reduces the contact angle, but it also reduces the pressure drop across that angle due to fluid viscosity.

  • In hydrophobic (oil-wet) materials, the increased pressure from fluid viscosity accelerates the flow of water into the pores, which causes more oil to leave the pores.

The slower movement of water into the pores in hydrophilic materials caused more oil to remain inside them, resulting in the counterintuitive result.

 

The TLDR: Dr. Jaeshik Chung of KIST said, “Groundwater remediation is not just a matter of materials science, but a representative multiphysics phenomenon that involves a complex interplay of fluid flow and interfacial reactions.”

 

While groundwater remediation is a noble goal unto itself, the research is not constrained to just that: “This research can…also [be applied] to various immiscible displacement processes in porous media, such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and carbon capture and storage (CCS).”

 

Caveat: While the researchers used diesel as their oil/contaminant proxy, “hydrocarbons” span a wider berth that impacts their molecular size and mobility throughout porous media.

 

More possibilities: This means the door is wide open for us geoscientists to perform similar experiments and investigations on a variety of hydrocarbons across porous media. There are still many knobs to turn in terms of pressures, pore characteristics (i.e., size, shape, orientation), and permeabilities.

 

Learn more: To build a foundation before embarking on such work, go here and here.

Sponsored

DIG logo (002)-1

DIG Supports Your Geochemistry Needs

  • Geochemistry and Isotope Measurement Laboratory
  • Exploration, Development, Production and Environmental
  • Oil - Gas – Water
  • Serving Global Energy Since 2006
REGISTER NOW

👍 If you enjoyed this edition of Enspired, consider supporting AAPG's brand of newsletters by forwarding to a friend or colleague and signing up for our other newsletters here.

➡️ Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up for Enspired here.

✉️ To get in touch with Sarah or suggest a topic for Enspired, send an email to editorial@aapg.org.

AAPG thanks our advertisers for their support. Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content. If you're interested in supporting AAPG digital products, reach out to Melissa Roberts.

 

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from AAPG.
To stop receiving this newsletter, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

 

American Association of Petroleum Geologists

 1444 S. Boulder Ave., Tulsa, OK 74119, USA

(918) 584-2555 | 1 (800) 364-2274 (US and Canada)

www.aapg.org

 

Facebook
LinkedIn
X
Instagram
YouTube