A U.N. report on how to utilize minerals for sustainable development; a report on U.S. potential and consumption of critical minerals; and a list of mineral mapping programs and databases.
This week’s Core Elements is Part 3 of our look into the state of mineral resources globally and in the United States, as well as related information and resources (see Editions #79 and #80 for parts one and two). Let’s get started.
Rasoul Sorkhabi
Editor, Core Elements
Harnessing the Potential of Critical Minerals
JLStock/Shutterstock.com
A report by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs discusses how critical minerals need to be utilized for sustainable development.
Selected Elements Critical for Energy Transition
According to the report,the most important elements for energy transition technologies are:
11 countries: Bismuth, chromium, germanium, indium, molybdenum, tin
10 countries: Beryllium, magnesium, zirconium
Reserves vs. Production in Select Developing Countries
Countries that overproduce compared to their reserves:
China: Graphite reserves (27.9 percent) and production (76.9 percent)
China: REE reserves (40 percent) and production (68.6 percent)
Gabon: Manganese reserves (3.2 percent) and production (23 percent)
Mozambique: Beryllium reserves (less than 1 percent) and production (7.3 percent)
Philippines: Nickel reserves (3.7) and production (11.1 percent)
Zimbabwe: Platinum reserves (1.7 percent) and production (10.6 percent)
Countries with more reserves than production:
Bolivia: Lithium reserves (23 percent) and production (almost 0 percent)
Brazil: REEs reserves (19.1 percent) and production (almost 0 percent)
Brazil: Graphite reserves (26.4 percent) and production (4.6 percent)
Brazil: Manganese reserves (14.2 percent) and production (3.1 percent)
Dominant suppliers and producers:
Democratic Republic of Congo: Cobalt reserves (54.5 percent) and production (73.9 percent)
South Africa: Platinum reserves (88.7 percent) and production (66.7 percent); Chromium reserves (35.7 percent) and production (43.9 percent); Manganese reserves (31.6 percent) and production (36 percent)
Indonesia: Nickel reserves (42.3 percent) and production (50 percent)
Chile: Lithium reserves (33.2 percent) and production (24.4 percent)
The Washington D.C.-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has published a report on the U.S. production potential and future consumption of certain critical minerals. Here are the highlights.
Geology rules: The report states,“U.S. geology is rich in iron, copper, zinc, lithium, molybdenum, gold, silver, platinum group metals, and phosphate.”
By the numbers: The United States is among world leaders in production for the following minerals:
Copper, gold, and Palladium (5thposition)
Molybdenum (4th)
Phosphate (3rd)
U.S. supply and demand in 2035(metric tonnes):
Copper:
Supply: 1,800,00
Demand: 2,915,875
Import dependence: -62 percent
Graphite:
Supply: 350,000
Demand: 1,026,795
Import dependence: -193 percent
Lithium:
Supply: 28,000
Demand: 106,936
Import dependence: -282 percent
Manganese:
Supply: 0
Demand: 810,300
Molybdenum:
Supply: 36,000
Demand: 16,644
Import dependence: +54 percent
Nickel:
Supply: 8,000
Demand: 749,987
Import dependence: -9,275 percent
Silver:
Supply: 1,400
Demand: 16,596
Import dependence: -1,085 percent
Zinc:
Supply: 950,000
Demand: 970,000
Import dependence: -2 percent
Priority minerals for US. offshoring engagement:
Very high priority: Nickel and cobalt
High priority: Graphite, lithium, manganese, silver
AAPG's technical journal,Bulletin, highlights the importance of geology in understanding natural resources critical to energy systems and associated environmental topics. It is peer-reviewed and includes some of the latest geological research available from around the world!
AAPG membership includes a complimentary subscription to the Bulletin. Subscriptions are also available for purchase to nonmembers.
What is USGS: Founded in 1879 by an act of the Congress, USGS is a federal agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior engaged in geological mapping and the study of energy, mineral and water resources, natural hazards, land use, and the environment.
Significance of mineral mapping for U.S. resource security: In 2024, the United States was 100 percent reliant on imports for 12 of the 50 critical minerals and more than 50 percent reliant on imports for an additional 29 critical minerals.
👍 If you enjoyed this edition of Core Elements, consider supporting AAPG's brand of newsletters by forwarding to a friend or colleague and signing up for our other newsletters here.
➡️ Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Subscribe to Core Elements here.
AAPG thanks our advertisers for their support. Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content. If you're interested in supporting AAPG digital products, reach out to Melissa Roberts.