Explore the USA’s deepest CO₂ well, lithium along the Yellowstone Hotspot, and a new link between Meteor Crater and the Grand Canyon.
View in browser
AAPG-logo-color-Horz
Core-Elements-Logo-1

Monday, 15 September, 2025/ Edition 76

Last week, Danile Minisini (AAPG Bulletin Editor) and I gave an AAPG Academy Webinar on the geoscience-energy nexus. A huge “Thank You” to those of you who could attend. For this week’s edition of Core Elements, I have picked three interesting stories from Wyoming, Nevada, and Arizona. I hope you find them informative as well.

Rasoul-Sorkhabi-Headshot-Signature (1)

 

Rasoul Sorkhabi

 

Editor, Core Elements

Deepest CO2 Injection Well in the USA

DeepestCO2InjectionWellInUSA

Sweetwater Carbon Hub and Class VI injection well (source: DOE and University of Wyoming)

Frontier Infrastructure Holdings, a developer of low-carbon infrastructures across the US Mountain West and Texas, in partnership with the University of Wyoming’s School of Energy Resources, has successfully completed a deep well for carbon storage in Wyoming. Let’s take a look.

 

Location:

  • Sweetwater Carbon Hub in Wyoming’s Sweetwater County is a key program to advance commercial-scale carbon sequestration.

  • It spans more than 100,000 acres in southwest Wyoming.

  • It is supported by the US Department of Energy’s CarbonSAFE initiative.

Injection well:

  • The J1-15 well drilled by Frontier is a Class VI well drilled to a depth of 18,437 feet – the deepest of its kind in the USA.

  • The well was initially drilled to access the Jurassic-age Nugget Sandstone but was deepened to reach the Mississippian-age Madison Limestone - a high porosity reservoir rock.

  • This is the second such well drilled by Frontier. The first well (SCS-1) was drilled to a depth of more than 16,000 feet and completed at the Nugget Sandstone.

Class VI Well: The Underground Injection Control program of the US Environmental Protection Agency includes six classes of injection wells, based on the type and depth of the injection activity.

  • Class VI wells are used for the injection of carbon dioxide into underground subsurface rock formations for long-term storage, or geologic sequestration.

Go deeper: Read the full report here.

Sponsored

DIG logo (002)-1

Produced Water Chemistry Analysis

  • Geochemistry and Isotope Measurement Laboratory
  • Exploration, Development, Production and Environmental
  • Oil - Gas – Water
    Serving Global Energy Since 2006
LEARN MORE

Lithium from Yellowstone Hotspot

LithiumFromYellowstoneHotspot

Volcanic trail of Yellowstone Hotspot (source: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology)

In Core Elements 45, we reviewed a study of rich lithium in McDermitt Caldera in Nevada. A new study in Geology expands on this and considers the McDermitt Caldera as part of the Yellowstone Hotspot track.

 

Yellowstone Hotspot:

  • Yellowstone Hotspot is in Yellowstone National Park in the northwestern corner of Wyoming – the world’s first national park designated in 1872.

  • As the North American continental plate has moved over this mantle plume, a trail of volcanic calderas has formed, extending from McDermitt (the oldest, at 16-17 Ma) to the Yellowstone Plateau (the youngest, at 2 Ma).

The New Study: Kathryn Watts of the US Geological Survey compared the concentrations of lithium in melt-inclusions in quartz crystals in volcanic rocks of various calderas in the Yellowstone Hotspot track. She used an ion microprobe for these measurements.

 

Results: The study found that calderas in the western part of the Yellowstone hotspot track, including McDermitt, are 200-2000 parts per million, while those in the eastern part, including Picabo caldera and the Yellowstone plateau, are less than 200 parts per million.

 

Interpretation: This difference in lithium concentrations may be related to different crustal types.

  • McDermitt and adjacent calderas developed in a transitional crust dominated by metasedimentary rocks, while the eastern calderas formed in purely continental crust of North America.

  • It seems that partial melting of crust with hydrous minerals, especially biotite, leads to more lithium-enriched melts.

Why it matters: This study is a contribution toward understanding the eruptive versus post-eruptive mobility of lithium in volcanic rocks.

 

Go deeper: Read the full article here.

Sponsored

2025 RMS Meeting Logo

Register for the 2025 RMS-AAPG Annual Meeting!

 

Join RMS-AAPG October 5-7 in Keystone, Colorado for a packed technical program, field trips, core viewing and networking!

REGISTER NOW

Meteor Crater’s Impact on the Grand Canyon

Meteor Crater’s Impact on Grand Canyon

From Meteor Crater to Grand Canyon (source: Wikipedia Commons)

The Meteor Crater and the Grand Canyon are two iconic and often-visited geological sites in Arizona. A study published in Geology suggests a story that connects these two.

 

Meteor Crater:

  • Meteor Crater, located 60 km southeast of Flagstaff in northern Arizona, is about 1200 meters wide and 170 meters deep and was created by a meteorite impact about 56,000 years ago.

  • It is named the Barringer Crater after Daniel Barringer, who believed the meteorite would be a rich source of iron.

  • The Barringer family still owns the Meteor Crater, although it was designated a National Natural Landmark in 1967.

Landslides in Grand Canyon: Karlstrom and colleagues in Geology argue that the Meteor Crater impact triggered a landslide in Grand Canyon, which then dammed the Colorado River and formed a paleolake they call Nankoweap.

 

The researchers suggest that the landslide was caused by an impact-generated earthquake of magnitude 5.4.

 

Lines of Evidence:

  • The researchers determined the ages of four driftwood samples collected from two caves – Santon’s Cave and Crystal Cave, both located in the Mississippian-age Redwall Limestone of Marble Canyon – along a section of the Colorado River upstream of Grand Canyon. These driftwood samples, dated by the Carbon-14 method, gave an age of 55,250 ± 2,440 years old.

  • The researchers also dated sediments associated with the driftwood samples. Two sediment samples dated by the luminescence method gave an age of 56,000 ± 6,390 years old.

  • The ages of driftwood and sediment samples overlap with the age of the Meteor Crater impact.

Hypothesized Nankoweap Lake:

  • The evidence for paleo-dam materials comes from large boulders of Kaibab Limestone in a fine-grained breccia of Paleozoic rock debris at the Nankoweap Creek delta.

  • The Kaibab Limestone blocks were probably derived from the cliffs on the opposite (east) side of the Colorado River.

Why it matters: It is important to understand the environmental changes of meteor impacts, and the Barringer Crater offers a case study of a relatively recent event.

 

Go deeper: Read the full report here.

👍 If you enjoyed this edition of Core Elements, consider supporting AAPG's brand of newsletters by forwarding to a friend or colleague and signing up for our other newsletters here.

➡️ Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Subscribe to Core Elements here.

✉️ To get in touch with Rasoul, send an email to editorial@aapg.org.

AAPG thanks our advertisers for their support. Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content. If you're interested in supporting AAPG digital products, reach out to Melissa Roberts.

 

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from AAPG.
To stop receiving this newsletter, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

 

American Association of Petroleum Geologists

 1444 S. Boulder Ave., Tulsa, OK 74119, USA

(918) 584-2555 | 1 (800) 364-2274 (US and Canada)

www.aapg.org

 

Facebook
LinkedIn
X
Instagram
YouTube