All aboard! Automating operations has been little more than an oncoming train for some, but for others, it has been a light at the end of the tunnel.
Automation de-risks so much of operations by increasing consistency, removing humans from hazardous environments, and never getting decision fatigue.
Slow and steady: Fracking operations have been slowly working their way towards automation for years, adding conditional automatic valve openings here, setting various sequences and their bounds there.
Love some combos: ProFrac and Seismos, though, are stepping up that game by combining their powers to deliver a real-time quality control system that can enable fully automated Closed Loop Fracturing.
Bring in the subsurface: ProFrac had already started to automate its surface operations with its ProPilot product, but adding in Seismos’s subsurface tools and skillset will let their customers take automation to a new level.
Matt Wilks, Executive Chairman of ProFrac, had this to say, "...we're delivering more control to operators through dynamic completion design that optimizes hydrocarbon recovery…Seismos [will be] acting as an independent auditor of downhole performance."
The system has modes that are both supervised and unsupervised.
-
Supervised mode delivers engineers and completions teams real-time, validated subsurface data which allows them to make any changes they need to on the fly in a timely manner.
-
Unsupervised mode involves handing the reins over to the system, sort of, by allowing it to execute a set of pre-defined actions based on real-time conditions, so some operations can be executed without human intervention.
Fresh look: Supervised mode sounds like, to me, how frac has been done before. Jobs are executed with real-time pressure and other downhole information streamed into the frac van or maybe offsite where completions engineers might make decisions based on the data.
I suppose adding in seismos gives some more downhole geologic information about the formation response to the job, but this sounds like things most frac jobs have onsite anyway.
The unsupervised part is something a lot of operators are stepping into, and being able to support the journey is only good for ProFrac and Seismos.
Simon says: Many operators don’t like the idea of handing their operations over to a machine, but they’re a lot more comfortable walking through various scenarios, giving guardrails, and lining up a set of common-sense instructions for a machine to execute given various conditions.
I suppose I would consider “supervised” mode a bit more of “business as usual with extra data” mode (not great for marketing, I suppose) and “unsupervised” mode as “supervised,” at least as I’ve understood learning models for AI.
Becoming more available: Marketing and names aside, it’s no longer just the big guys like HAL or LOS that are looking to offer semi-autonomous frac operations.
As geoscientists, we’re unlikely to be programming frac bots anytime soon. But our data and information should inform some of the conditions and instructions they receive, which means you might have to have some conversations with your frac engineers before they go off and program these things without input from us.
To learn more about ProFrac and Seismos’s partnership, go here.